Graphic violence should be monitored and restricted

The short answer is: Although experts agree that no single factor can cause a nonviolent person to act aggressively, heavy exposure to violent media can be a risk factor for violent behavior. Children who are exposed to multiple risk factors -- including aggression and conflict at home -- are the most likely to behave aggressively.

Graphic violence should be monitored and restricted

Watching adult content can make children susceptible to commiting violent or sexually inappropriate acts In a study done carried out by Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute in children who watched between one and three hours of children's television programmes each week had a higher chance of growing up to commit violent acts than those who watched less than an hour of childrens TV a day[[ BBC Online News "Talking Point can watching childrenhttp: Now although this study is based on children's television it raises questions as to what adult content a child should watch.

Already we get reports of violent attacks by children and sexual assualts on children by children being exposed to things at a younger age than they should have been.

Television might feed their illusions and ambitions but it is indisputably a great source of information and contains not only violent but educational themes as well.

Parents who are not capable of directing their children on the right life path cannot blame television because it can only be a part of the problem but never the problem itself. It is better that children start being exposed to adult themes before they're completely independent so that their parents or other support networks can help them interpret and make sense of what they're seeing.

Preventing children from encountering these themes attempts to protect them until the age of majority, then throws them in the deep end. One does not magically gain the ability to deal with mature themes on a certain day, it is developed over time like other aspects of one's personality and parental involvement in this process will, in most cases, assist children in developing their ability to cope with the adult world.

There is also another element that contributes to this disscusion which must be added. In todays society most, if not all adults think that they in public maintain a sort of facade if you will and wont ever deviate from what is commonly accepted by society. One such case that difinatively proves this is the famous play, Antigone by plato which explores the psychology of the human mind when faced with an ethical dilemma, should he obey and follow what he is told and kill the man or should he disobey the authourity and refuse to do as such and save his life.

By now i would expect almost all of you would have chosen to refuse allow a man to be killed, but the surprising thing is that when faced with such a decision in real life we are not as quick, as demonstrated by a simple experiment where there is a teacher, an assistant and a learner.

Both the teacher and the learner are actors, while the assistant is an ordinary person. The teacher tells the assistant to read out the words and if the learner doesnt recite them he or she flips a switch which will administer the student an electric shock. The teacher will never come in contact with neither the assistant nor the learner during the duration of the experiment, and the learner will indicate that he is in pain when he "recieves" an electric shock at increacing levels of intensity.

The results of this experiment were extremely surprising. This is the difference between what people think when they are presented with a situation and what they do in that situation. The assistant could have stopped participating in the experiment at anytime of their own free will.

It also concluded that most of the assistants were more worried about the legal compications after the experiment after which the teacher assured them he or she would take full responsibility the assistant continued administering shocks.

This diffinatively proves that people are much more concerned with their public face than ethical or moral correctness.

Another point that is more than present in most of society is bias. It is the mind of a person who really seeks the truth to look upon the world in the third person completely free from bias and solely on the facts, and from this ideas evolve.

The main bias present is religeon. Christianity teaches people that both violence and sex are sin and thus forth negative. There are also those who worship so blindly they become hypocrits and they themselves commit violence.

A similar problem is the hypocracy exhibited by people worship so blindly they cannot and will not see their own sins. These are all issues that are bought around by bias and can be resolved by thinking in the third person which allows a free mind. There is also the steriotype that adults are older and thus smarter.

This is pure ignorence and to the greatest extent patronizing I have once had a teacher who patronized me and verbally abused me till in court i displayed my intellect and successfully sued her. She lost her job from the department of education and was banned from teaching till after an anger management course, after which she found a job at a public school where she was shanked to death by one of her students.

Violent or sexual programming has no intrinsic worth beyond the entertainment it provides. Even if the harms are small, why should we accept them? With very few exceptions, the media that would be most commonly affected by such a ban exists solely for entertainment's sake and for the profit that can be made by its distribution.

There are lots of non-violent or age-appropriate ways to entertain children. Even if we agree that research has demonstrated only moderate or uncertain harm from exposure to such media, what is the harm in preventing it from being seen by children?

Rights, even fundamental ones like free speech, are not absolute; they are measured on a criteria of social harms and benefits.

Graphic violence should be monitored and restricted

This is why, despite my right to free speech, I can't shout fire in a crowded theatre or talk about bombs in an airport. There is an overwhelming public safety interest in preventing some harmful forms of speech and preventing these particular types of expression does not greatly harm me.

In the case of children's programming, preventing a few "bad apples" from becoming violent after exposure to inappropriate media represents a significant social benefit and the only harm is that adults are slightly inconvenience by having to show ID from time to time. Any legislation would be impossible to enforce Legal restrictions would be nearly impossible to enforce in the way that same trying to restrict what children watch on DVD's is.

Currently the law prohibits children from buying DVD's and video shops from selling and renting them.Does exposure to violent movies or video games make kids more aggressive? Does exposure to violent movies or video games make kids more aggressive? see our answer. Does exposure to violent movies or video games make kids more aggressive?

see our answer. 68 comments. What's the impact of media violence on kids?

Does exposure to violent movies or video games make kids more aggressive?

You wouldn't know it if you weren't. How can graphic violence not affect us at any age? We're human and should, be default, be caring towards other humans. but I definitely think that what children watch should be monitored, especially if there is a noticeable change in their behavior.

A 45 year old has to be restricted on what they see. Should the national government censor the media in order to protect the public? Add a New Topic; Add to My Favorites Debate This Topic; Report This Topic; Should the national government censor the media in order to protect the public?

Censorship prevents people from gaining access to knowledge that shouldn’t really be restricted . Much like movies and TV, graphic or disturbing content that contains violence, gore, or shocking content is not suitable for minors and will be age-restricted.

Terrorist content We do not permit terrorist organizations to use YouTube for any purpose, including recruitment. Most video games would be non entertaining to children if it didn't have a hint of violence in it. This would bring down so many ideas in the media and get rid of some of the greatest video games in history.

Home > Opinions > Society > Should violent video games be banned? Add a New Topic. Should violent video games be banned? Video Game Violence and Why It Should End. adults are too busy doing their own things and don't have the time to monitor their children, leaving them to develop on their own.

Youtube has plenty of examples of .

Violent or graphic content policies - YouTube Help